[Bug 267717] Resurrect devel/root
- In reply to: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 267717] New port: science/root"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 22:15:01 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=267717 --- Comment #6 from Erik Jensen <erik@tenku.dk> --- Comment #1, comment #5 - thank you very much for your helpful replies, Chris! I have changed the title of the port. Do you prefer to keep the port in the “devel” category? I personally think it would fit a bit better in the “science” category, but my opinions in this regard are neither super strong nor pulling on much more than a few months of experience with FreeBSD ports. I can also see a couple of arguments against naming the port the (in my opinion, very poorly chosen) name of the software “root”, but this is what the original authors have decided upon, so I initially chose this name for the port. The official GitHub project has this name for the code repository as well. Do you, anyway, think a port name such as “cernroot” would be better, so as not to confuse the port for a sysadmin account and similar? I think I have managed to prepare the port. I have been running a testport on my specifications in a poudriere jail, but compiling gcc11 (a prerequisite for some of the python dependencies, I believe; ROOT itself is compiled with llvm/clang) on my current limited capacity system hit the default timeout of 24 hours! I see in the documentation that there are several ways to get around this. Anyway, in not too long I’m hoping to be able to upload the port here. Thanks again -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.