[Bug 264196] sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: read(2)ing big files in blocks of 32768 bytes and smaller fails with EINVAL
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264196] sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: read(2)ing big files in blocks of 32768 bytes and smaller fails with EINVAL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264196] sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: read(2)ing big files in blocks of 32768 bytes and smaller fails with EINVAL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264196] sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: read(2)ing big files in blocks of 32768 bytes and smaller fails with EINVAL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264196] sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: read(2)ing big files in blocks of 32768 bytes and smaller fails with EINVAL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264196] sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: read(2)ing big files in blocks of 32768 bytes and smaller fails with EINVAL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264196] sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: read(2)ing big files in blocks of 32768 bytes and smaller fails with EINVAL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264196] sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: read(2)ing big files in blocks of 32768 bytes and smaller fails with EINVAL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264196] sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: read(2)ing big files in blocks of 32768 bytes and smaller fails with EINVAL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264196] sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: read(2)ing big files in blocks of 32768 bytes and smaller fails with EINVAL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264196] sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: read(2)ing big files in blocks of 32768 bytes and smaller fails with EINVAL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264196] sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: read(2)ing big files in blocks of 32768 bytes and smaller fails with EINVAL"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 264196] sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: read(2)ing big files in blocks of 32768 bytes and smaller fails with EINVAL"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 04:11:08 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264196 Bug ID: 264196 Summary: sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: read(2)ing big files in blocks of 32768 bytes and smaller fails with EINVAL Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: danfe@FreeBSD.org CC: asomers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd@dussan.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(freebsd@dussan.org) CC: freebsd@dussan.org Attachment #234168 text/plain mime type: Created attachment 234168 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=234168&action=edit Demo program that does the read(2) With the recent 14.0-CURRENT (n255230) and fusefs-ntfs-2017.3.23 (UBLIO=off), I'm frequently getting errors when copying not-very-small files with scp(1) to remote machines, but not with rsync(1); cat(1)ing file e.g. to /dev/null also fails. Running those programs under truss(1) reveals interesting bug: reading the files on Windows 10 formatted NTFS with block of size 32768 and smaller (stat(2) returns optimal size of 4096 bytes, which both scp(1) and cat(1) use) fails after several blocks; rsync(1) uses 262144 and does not fail. Even more interestingly, it does not fail on first couple of blocks and on previously read ones, i.e. once the file had been read, it can be read again with smaller block size. I've written a program to demonstrate this (attached): $ ls -l xorgproto-2021.5.tbz -rw-r--r-- 1 danfe wheel 245998 21 янв. 14:11 xorgproto-2021.5.tbz $ /tmp/a.out xorgproto-2021.5.tbz 32768 using i/o size 32768 (optimal 4096) read: Invalid argument 1 reads were successful $ /tmp/a.out xorgproto-2021.5.tbz 32768 using i/o size 32768 (optimal 4096) read: Invalid argument 3 reads were successful $ /tmp/a.out xorgproto-2021.5.tbz 32768 using i/o size 32768 (optimal 4096) $ /tmp/a.out xorgproto-2021.5.tbz -1 using i/o size 4096 (optimal 4096) I'm not sure if the bug is in the port or fusefs(5) implementation, so I'm CC'ing Alan in case he might have a clue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.