[Bug 261096] lang/sbcl: should also be enabled for arm64
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261096] lang/sbcl: should also be enabled for arm64"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261096] lang/sbcl: should also be enabled for arm64"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261096] lang/sbcl: should also be enabled for arm64"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261096] lang/sbcl: should also be enabled for arm64"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261096] lang/sbcl: should also be enabled for arm64"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261096] lang/sbcl: should also be enabled for arm64"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261096] lang/sbcl: should also be enabled for arm64"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261096] lang/sbcl: should also be enabled for arm64"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261096] lang/sbcl: should also be enabled for arm64"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:50:09 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261096 Bug ID: 261096 Summary: lang/sbcl: should also be enabled for arm64 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: arm64 URL: https://sbcl.sourceforge.io/news.html#2.2.0 OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: krion@FreeBSD.org Reporter: fuz@fuz.su Assignee: krion@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(krion@FreeBSD.org) With sbcl version 2.2.0, support for aarch64 FreeBSD has been added to upstream. Could you look into amending the port so it supports this architecture? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.