[Bug 268359] audio/d11amp 0.59: New Port 2
- In reply to: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 268359] audio/d11amp 0.59: New Port 2"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:51:55 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268359 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Dettbarn <dettus@dettus.net> --- (In reply to Fernando ApesteguĂa from comment #1) Thank you for asking. Actually, my MP3 player is not "different", but rather a Reimagining of XMMS. (Which was awesome, but which ran out of support 2007). Afaik, XMMS itself was a fork from X11AMP, which was the X11 Version of WinAmp. You can find the true glory over here: https://skins.webamp.org There are other players in the ports, but most of the ones I found were either "just" command line applications, or based on frontends with a semi-commercial licensing model. Or they were not able to show WinAmps skins on modern 4K Monitors. So I created my own, based on GTK4, with the ability to scale up the skins. If you are making the argument that there are already too many Mp3 players in the ports, what is one more, right? (Even though the others are more mature) Also, this is the essence of Open Source to me: Give users as many options to choose from as possible. And if they are not satisfied with them (like me), have them create their own! :) I would also like to point out that (at the moment I am writing this) OpenBSD, NetBSD and ArchLinux have accepted d11amp into their home. So, to sum up, I have two arguments for my MP3 player: 1. The license situation is clearer (Even the default skin is EXPLICITLY shareable under CC-0) 2. It looks badass-oldskool and should invoke a sense of nostalgia in MP3-conisseurs like myself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.