[Bug 263382] mail/dovecot-fts-elastic: New Port Request
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 263382] mail/dovecot-fts-elastic: New Port Request"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 263382] mail/dovecot-fts-elastic: New Port Request"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 263382] mail/dovecot-fts-elastic: New Port Request"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 23:20:45 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263382 Bug ID: 263382 Summary: mail/dovecot-fts-elastic: New Port Request Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: bgupta@kde.org Created attachment 233286 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=233286&action=edit shar file with port Hi, I've been using this plugin on my local Dovecot instance and thought I'd create a port. Please find a SHAR archive attached. This should go into mail/dovecot-fts-elastic. The port itself is pretty simple (it's actually based on dovecot-fts-xapian which was almost pretty much exactly what I needed). One limitation of this plugin (and I guess this is common to all Dovecot FTS plugins) is that it'll need a rebuild anytime Dovecot itself is rebuilt - there are no binary compatibility guarantees - so please feel free to let me know if I need to add something for this. And one question I'd have is - can I just request a binary port of this to be added to pkg (I guess that absolves me of having to remember to rebuild this every time I see dovecot getting updated), or does it need to hit some form of popularity contest standards? Thanks, Boudhayan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.