From nobody Fri Nov 29 14:44:01 2024 X-Original-To: pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Y0GCP5fWNz5fGY9 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 14:44:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Y0GCP2l1Jz4KmM for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 14:44:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1732891441; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9EGM70EEh9JjiGKzKajA1WaK+dkz/7M5sC6sBs6kIwM=; b=FVeNEJJshf9Htm1613NEuLWw1Wffg/2hOReGL66Zu2lR4sprwPoWm8AjW/gVDD4i8xEDsJ M0oRkqyN04VDu57iLbmLSGZO+1kpLwSbXp/n588/fZVSIPGYC2FPGcAeW8P13aqE4pZS8b qAKPYLWEZHSXMyFrDMvHsZ67iePH0qf4CE9X0GSNk9Ik/WjiZn1pV3EZGXmoM7WT6ofrBX ikXb5NsQpXTsirG3MzeIbXMcmUwSQkIHsJ83FsOb57KfZTaGjHMUAAhWcvAYlvHvAmJsXA eAHKZxi75oC5pfwebHeq91zE+lumk6X+fKQFeeKZ5OMF1rCP7KcTT/6wGuIS4A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1732891441; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=PmhK1ydu2UHgEivTCRMoG6vrvxlqCaPp0Qqy8tYraIG+qT6+VMji23lXh36ppOvaLmLnyz jtSU7uxSVb/Shyehwoz7YNoERV8SSr9m1PWENlwLJpgdZDOvgfFOQLR6DO05qn2NNYEm50 +XFzU/GLS0ieSzu/MXntJyzKTLUtrM6n7kTMIFUwkYnObMgu7+vI2L7Tk2lyJ79uFSEfXA prGjbIC1uY+TEd/O+dYl2FwRVA8rJ+XmQfu8EtjFBOBuRypolqPzdnf6Jp3LxcK460kdkf OcqkfTB11ULE3Sd0DMCOr/zjuGuKLOuaPaWv+Oy9VZl/Vfj1Up83EyZAFfpuCA== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Y0GCP2MB0zSK6 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 14:44:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4ATEi1gw003815 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 14:44:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 4ATEi1Ue003814 for pkg@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 14:44:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280607] ports-mgmt/pkg: pkg unlock --all fails Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 14:44:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: franco@opnsense.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280607 --- Comment #6 from Franco Fichtner --- (In reply to p5B2EA84B3 from comment #5) You could have reacted 2 months ago based on the fact that I did provide you with a probable patch to your issue within the hour of your issue being ope= ned? Just maybe someone could have been pinged to ask for inclusion in a new pkg release, but that time is lost now either way. OPNsense hit the same issue back in July. https://github.com/opnsense/update/issues/93 Cheers, Franco --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=