From nobody Thu Jul 18 15:09:54 2024 X-Original-To: pf@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WPx761d6jz5Rb1w for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:09:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WPx7572VDz4Dgl for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1721315394; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QykJUQBs+k6gzeYjcXPeluGhOEoQBGNPaON4w5rw8FHLElcw7DZefP/TQr6BkcdGoZfdt5 Zb5pA2+8Y1mtBz3ksOM9Zl5yPaPE0ameombYidr8Ix50k1tlaIAPboT6UhzBEpgynppmix y3ELjetjAL87HCPtU6l3vyGMAGU+KuGCE1cAn+/d+whvStQwA2idg8fHPtGBwViLCHvA75 vnatoj1JfztOJls8IqKR5jgkAxIlb3G4eu0yqjOTCzkW0/RNt3FxE54XLaToRx8vyQLABs MTr/6WNVGjEJP7SObFaAap0JAgq5A0wwPiXvYYjsnmLLmb5Ml0n07HvTtY8hlQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1721315394; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SOKnHRU1Fwui8MIglER0VzuhC8mqdUEWfD5JJM0pSG8=; b=dvjD4Q4cJiBHJ9bneqb5xu11Dy6ZVPbi+UVUSD5+Rsw/ImO87or4PW/BkN6kTaHCfuMRci E4+n2f+wtk7lGKhxSoNQOLLwR6CZIYqeS2c9C4ADtZ4JF/8qzwXGLtdZs4EOIbU9DQyMvU G4/gbwb29I1l5iTBtbf1UG1dveWuxWYwK6Tfbo7wnQqA06GCmo2G8qL+RqSt5tBN0YAH8W +xDanDvEQNk3AeikPCy4sM8CcPZhscivKIJKTv2neRnygp6CTnDrRD58K/KIJ2fd2ou630 R2+hyKODcTDG+T8W31u/tFczpGg2cZ2X8fBGzUgLbUO1Rtt30Nr6Cjvi7mEPBg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WPx756Ym7ztCW for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 46IF9rrF019320 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:09:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 46IF9rLJ019318 for pf@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:09:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pf@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 279899] pf_unlink_state mutex unlock page fault panic Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:09:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: franco@opnsense.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pf@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter (pf) List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pf List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D279899 --- Comment #17 from Franco Fichtner --- I'm not sure. We were testing with multiple users since this morning based = on 0dddcc6576+a69d075e96a6 and I haven't gotten that stack trace again neither from the users nor from my main unit running it. It's not reliable confirma= tion yet but it looks better than 0dddcc6576 crashing regularly. As for running pfsync_drop() now vs. not before it's interesting to note th= at a69d075e96a6 doesn't apply without 0dddcc6576 (same as 5f75cd390) and direc= tly modifies that call as well. Cheers, Franco --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=