Re: Chelsio Forwarding performance and RELENG_13 vs RELENG_12

From: Navdeep Parhar <nparhar_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:31:36 UTC
On 10/18/22 12:16 PM, mike tancsa wrote:
> I updated a RELENG_12 router along with the hardware to RELENG_13 (oct 
> 14th kernel) and was surprised to see an increase in 
> dev.cxl.0.stats.rx_ovflow0 at a somewhat faster rate than I was seeing 
> on the older slightly slower hardware under about the same load. 
> (Xeon(R) E-2226G CPU @ 3.40GHz) vs a 4 core Xeon same freq, same memory 
> speed. About 150Kpps in and out and a 1Gb/s throughput
> 
> loader.conf is the same
> 
> 
> hw.cxgbe.toecaps_allowed="0"
> hw.cxgbe.rdmacaps_allowed="0"
> hw.cxgbe.iscsicaps_allowed="0"
> hw.cxgbe.fcoecaps_allowed="0"
> hw.cxgbe.pause_settings="0"
> hw.cxgbe.attack_filter="1"
> hw.cxgbe.drop_pkts_with_l3_errors="1"
> 
> As there is a large routing table, I do have
> 
> [fib_algo] inet.0 (radix4_lockless#46) rebuild_fd_flm: switching algo to 
> radix4
> [fib_algo] inet6.0 (radix6_lockless#58) rebuild_fd_flm: switching algo 
> to radix6
> 
> kicking in.
> 
> and sysctl.conf
> 
> net.route.multipath=0
> 
> net.inet.ip.redirect=0
> net.inet6.ip6.redirect=0
> kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216
> net.inet.tcp.blackhole=1
> 
> Are there any other tweaks that can be done in order to better 
> forwarding performance ? I do see at bootup time
> 
> cxl0: nrxq (6), hw RSS table size (128); expect uneven traffic 
> distribution.
> cxl1: nrxq (6), hw RSS table size (128); expect uneven traffic 
> distribution.
> cxl3: nrxq (6), hw RSS table size (128); expect uneven traffic 
> distribution.
> 
> The cpu is 6 core. No HT enabled

The old system was 4-core so it must have used 4 queues.  Can you please 
try that on the new system and see how it does?

hw.cxgbe.ntxq=4
hw.cxgbe.nrxq=4

Regards,
Navdeep