From nobody Wed Mar 09 17:38:27 2022 X-Original-To: office@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056271A0E34C for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 17:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KDKDN4tqJz4lW1 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 17:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73C07152D4 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 17:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 229HcS6c033634 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 17:38:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 229HcSKJ033632 for office@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 17:38:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 262008] editors/libreoffice failed to build Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 17:38:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: dim@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-office List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-office@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1646847508; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UriX5CqNHDol9vJsp4Kua3RVNmNakj2Ut7TUjTK7JFE=; b=RayA68KfGIvZDo/2GqVVe2/x0Kt4YevBiTcufBm6KF+GHJm587ky7EPYOzdXepvkjaflKn RejHxsYnj8Hnw9fEoS/9nKpFt+up2pPZR8t8ox8PksQtea4EiaHgmWmB8OQw3+9HyYRjWa vSp8u1KcZmQrrkWu0cqFR8gOFYfc2ZyS9KFjDJv7RTPNYpyAQ4sj1xy1YlBfWYay4r2XVf jCMt2v8yNjS9sLCU1oYb7oViGF68EbIWPOYUpQaYRk3DHatPWRNN1GpHMsjLBqMrXIt8ob 7EMM+H/e3pbzg3FmcaZ3qbEQ0+r1e/0lqcoD05rX7zjzz/oV+KAjsIP8rnzE8w== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1646847508; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=UDb2nR5mMUCg8zlKlGjDEy/5BClHQvWfDj/wM9/uRY3AltSuHl9hDhV88HU9wKumw8g8+Z 2ZIkuP/g6LMS6Q+Il4ioZp4NHezexu228BLJNhPWQrYcuPp7lloJWAt5fPMUsMf3YLtOFs oqEzPqNj8J9+dQVVatVAn3drj1qLNXA6beYtUghd+eI58c+c7WRa5ZwLLEkwfPmaoa4gI1 1utZyqsQareP1BZUPcf52j+VqsZ+olbCd4hdxEIvpTX89hQgcpjSoIGxXyIyGTTrZAsR2+ CuJ9hmPwVIqxVD4nBeqmEkO+5puIZ2p2I9Uxm8ISByEgV4yQUEEiOnsZyLLitw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D262008 --- Comment #57 from Dimitry Andric --- (In reply to Piotr Kubaj from comment #53) Upstream doesn't have the libc++abi workaround parts for powerpc and powerp= c64, so maybe it was never necessary there? Or maybe nobody ever ran into the is= sue on these architectures. The question is whether the addition of __attribute__((aligned)) to struct _Unwind_Exception makes any difference in the size of __cxa_exception on the platform. On x86_64, the maximum alignment is 16 bytes, so the addition of= the attribute makes the total struct grow from 120 to 128 bytes. Depending on how powerpc and powerpc64 struct layouts end up, adding the attribute may or may not make a difference. If it does, then we should prob= ably add a similar piece of workaround code as was done for x86_64. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=