maintainer-approval requested: [Bug 262008] editors/libreoffice failed to build : [Attachment 232274] Fix build with PDFIUM and LTO enabled.
- In reply to: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 262008] editors/libreoffice failed to build"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2022 22:58:15 UTC
Florian Walpen <dev@submerge.ch> has asked FreeBSD Office Team <office@FreeBSD.org> for maintainer-approval: Bug 262008: editors/libreoffice failed to build https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262008 Attachment 232274: Fix build with PDFIUM and LTO enabled. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=232274&action=edit --- Comment #46 from Florian Walpen <dev@submerge.ch> --- Created attachment 232274 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=232274&action=edit Fix build with PDFIUM and LTO enabled. This supposedly fixes the build failure with PDFIUM and LTO enabled: When libvcllo.so is linked together with libpdfiumlo.so, it also needs libopenjp2.so from graphics/openjpeg, since pdfium depends on that. Building with LTO exposes this as an error, complaining about undefined references to openjpeg library functions. This patch adds the missing linker flag "-lopenjp2". Tested on 13.0-RELEASE-p7, successfully opened some documents. What puzzles me is that the LTO package seems to use more disk space than the one without LTO. But I don't have time to investigate now.