freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.org
Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions
January 2025 Archives by thread
- [Bug 240856] sqrt problem: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Sat, 25 Jan 2025 08:12:50 UTC)
- [Bug 240856] sqrt problem: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Sat, 25 Jan 2025 08:29:09 UTC)
- [Bug 216855] C11 conformance: ctanl() is missing: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Sun, 26 Jan 2025 14:17:06 UTC)
- [Bug 218514] [LIBM] implementations of sinpi[fl], cospi[fl], and tanpi[fl]: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Sun, 26 Jan 2025 14:17:15 UTC)
- [Bug 216853] C11 conformance: ccosl() is missing: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Sun, 26 Jan 2025 14:17:26 UTC)
- [Bug 216854] C11 conformance: csinl() is missing: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Sun, 26 Jan 2025 14:17:32 UTC)
- [Bug 216859] C11 conformance: ccoshl() is missing: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Sun, 26 Jan 2025 14:17:39 UTC)
- [Bug 216860] C11 conformance: csinhl() is missing: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Sun, 26 Jan 2025 14:17:45 UTC)
- [Bug 216861] C11 conformance: ctanhl() is missing: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Sun, 26 Jan 2025 14:17:52 UTC)
- [Bug 216864] cpow(), cpowf(), and cpowl() need better implementations: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Sun, 26 Jan 2025 14:17:57 UTC)
- [Bug 216865] math powl(3) uses a poor algorithm due to clang kludge: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Sun, 26 Jan 2025 14:18:04 UTC)
- [Bug 218514] [LIBM] implementations of sinpi[fl], cospi[fl], and tanpi[fl]: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Sun, 26 Jan 2025 16:10:04 UTC)
- [Bug 224326] double subnormals are not well printed on printing with printf (and friends): bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Mon, 27 Jan 2025 10:59:36 UTC)
- [Bug 251091] lib msun remainder() gives incorrect result on powerpc64: bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org (Mon, 27 Jan 2025 11:00:33 UTC)