From nobody Sun Jan 26 19:26:56 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Yh1lB0BFdz5lSlc for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 19:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Yh1l96h2jz3PdF; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 19:27:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1737919621; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Rl3jSonf/39HLzdaK2Q6FpqlrE8D5p8dcc5wulRWlaQ=; b=Dj7gIVCs/LAoVLh30Ma3CIOMMbd8wIvvppANXvyGmuUD0cHZRXOoV/QCxCADjGM4W3CWzt l2McvrOpJwYi9IZPCMv8gl4+p1+E/6w4yosSqG5j1Ty5/t2unK2X54U0acKngkXVnD9aAd y5iUiUyCpZUZAp4Np0KUXrU9chxDBKdSbHrS/VzxWq+DPlQVs3WFEsTxBjjBPoQ+FLq3nL XnnhFFoAr89yAy6lN9y9fxP7NQjopxZEb3vR62dZpLg3BYpXKc0/H4lso7FZf0WN7YsIAs EWw3kTv5DdJgos/2Ui7V1MO/jccZK9jGvyXvSXTBOAcCxxKxOy1FPRIurYyDmA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1737919621; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Rl3jSonf/39HLzdaK2Q6FpqlrE8D5p8dcc5wulRWlaQ=; b=EJpTMthV+QZo2zkrc2xDmFqOD1MU1EpKNJR8LtNNOjslFZhWjkH1p9MJMELhhV+ZT5dwQB lfssQ3QjjB7loGthPzIKOx2t0AhtpdLxqFh/yahR9aZy/UoJ5lXl+yUh3xYhWncpvPSdxf +nvSSMmHmFiPUgz26cuzgn1tfJd8rw8RG5FKOEM4xi3QLs94AeMBufFIBAG6gtOXTpBHPo GYKSZDLsS12nWir1jDmXCo8Hrzw7G1d+41efTAeHNdFJ1bruQhdhGLQWueeE1HxrUThqVj +6jWAFVd1DVWpvDYzM8XDfIVpQSTSErLa09H3i067Bv97LFlSXNywBcZ1CgOsg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1737919621; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=RkO8OWVcKF8g4K+Y84wlZ/0ZtFQ5ldguR3OyCLPnS5c1/A8529teUC9/JK3nJe7XaySnRj tafUZtUxKhYsLhjmJF4OZ+uuGLbaorZK2U8ibuX+dz/A7csLkFdltONAaAKqVppsZ5uOdL MT1YObo2XG+vvC3iS47V59yv7fPMjO88XkR1Gn3EXXLNM185e9s5+Hk8RNTPG+0PkfjO40 TLoYsAW6vhjRGIsDBOlpd2xcFM0Pan4rDGcIWH2dp4RehXytTVdKwy+TCyp1kJ5hQZnabE epZ+uE8GMLWTy91C6LQ0+zn6scEH4sLoo/YbI3eNEoBVkHkivnzVZtbm+0yy7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from mx-01.divo.sbone.de (mx-01.divo.sbone.de [IPv6:2003:a:140a:2200:6:594:fffe:19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx-01.divo.sbone.de", Issuer "E6" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: bz/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Yh1l94zvDz13GD; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 19:27:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:1025]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-01.divo.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D1E2A64805; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 19:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de (content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:2742]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AF532D029DD; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 19:26:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:1025]) by content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de (content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id joItFbIQdMjI; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 19:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from strong-iwl0.sbone.de (strong-iwl0.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:b66b:fcff:fef3:e3d2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13C282D029D8; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 19:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 19:26:56 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: Franco Fichtner , Mark Johnston cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: debugnet_any_ifnet_update: Bad dn_init result In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <1ns60762-409o-0675-n2s5-n9qn4o306292@SerrOFQ.bet> References: X-OpenPGP-Key-Id: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Mon, 7 Feb 2022, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Hi, > > Looking at https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?h=65366903c3a29 > and seeing it is still the case in stable/13 would it make sense to > remove the printf() as it seems to be irritating users... > > debugnet_any_ifnet_update: Bad dn_init result from igb0 (ifp 0xfffff80003663800), ignoring. > debugnet_any_ifnet_update: Bad dn_init result from igb1 (ifp 0xfffff800038b9800), ignoring. > > So far the only reports are for igb(4). I still see them on main these days with igb (and obviously boot-v): [13.542599] debugnet_any_ifnet_update: Bad dn_init result from igb1 (ifp 0xfffff80003789000), ignoring. [14.568307] debugnet_any_ifnet_update: Bad dn_init result from igb2 (ifp 0xfffff8000378a000), ignoring. I use igb0 to netboot so it is UP by definition. I looked at the code as I figured I want to know "what bad result" (either error code or otherwise) to see the comment there. Is it worth looking at it? I am not a debugnet consumer given it never grew IPv6 support to my best knowledge but this is likely a igb ordering issue? /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7