From nobody Wed Sep 04 18:47:07 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WzWgh5pFBz5V9NK for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 18:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WzWgh4gl1z3xZb for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 18:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1725475632; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Yf6wXfwQcJIDOwinaYPp76UNQf+5oxwYDvFVsqVlJn0xYRr4JHJ7ik3Catp2v8so1il0+R M7w14J9yLnQPPoLzlc792loabbmD/quW/w/6/zK+T1PdV4WzBJHPon9Gn6zFr9Qb7iHDJK mgCko4disZiuuq3y/SQ3yCUmpjfOeMm9vO/R8mlDOJWSi6HhI5fBtEh2yeZVwZjydioD7Q /Obb6Kpr+EmMXiwZZSjA4ZP964j3blxPYodEBh4CcetwPd8uyNAhkiHSbfyNTHqiNk9EcD MCJOPWWIm4H2avcvSD8/b6k2y3TC7XFG6mVlFVXSD526PkRU/D7wfNMgp2+jXA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1725475632; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gtFSBV3hJq38hBoMqs4CjBlPtOXz4J+9bbn5yvhFKVk=; b=eoUAhAj9fF7Gqfq1YEhwqRpoyl3gxcGr0n2rnjB+tYGhO2IKNa94xaF1VysUWdTs7WXeWt UK3mYwhpVDtgyDk4RxRgAGrEcxDR8MnRoy+ZZxifQWGbXTUfFMw5Xb+o+D8vfIfeNnYmz8 b/WEpwLD7lUsPv69YAshJXPJNB43yINHb0NIYXm1j6kZFn8w5FIBun70H6pdWIFQF1iODN L8SH2leIgqEJUxCdQYTh24JNLHFyTCI/5uU8PtS/zySpbPgaXNSj0oKoprZ4jXqlJ8XRc9 zuV9Xc+7LEi4/9dFp5/Ynj6luuobV4BEMkPchL0/e9G0YEyI+akgsxN+mn+fwA== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WzWgh4H3vzc2d for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 18:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 484IlCxK041766 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 18:47:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 484IlCUg041763 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 18:47:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280036] Data corruption over if_ovpn (OpenVPN DCO) observed Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 18:47:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280036 --- Comment #15 from Marek Zarychta --- (In reply to Kristof Provost from comment #12) >I still can't reproduce this A few questions arise: Could the issue described in comment #10 be reproduc= ible when sendfile(2) uses UFS as a backend?=20 Is sendfile(2) on ZFS reliable and safe? AFAIR there were issues with sendfile(8) and ZFS in the past.=20 FWIW: the file I have experimented with seems to be untouched, at least the checksums of the file and those taken from various historical ZFS snapshots= are the same. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=