From nobody Tue Sep 03 18:12:41 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WytyN5HQ5z5Thv9 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 18:12:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WytyN47dxz4LZT for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 18:12:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1725387164; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=yTZJ4d99EwkRgG2zLJefmLUD/gRZJKS7iTtAV56ZJ/awfmKXzWpaKTL9CuxYaKOEpELtkI vIVZg65MX7usxLszwJyhOFMVvJKXdvHXKSXUt/t/LYDGDSkr4frmXrzA9RepK6xulLkB+y C86+CA/JMEoZkWxe3BggyNrh5SydE+fe2aojFZkaowubmjQswENKcCIg7A3LPAs0ynBoso TkyTi0sG0ybBG/OczWPP5+KsRbVCpOFfWQQNUN5kPSl0vLK0261CAPakrxjssj2ANNyXGd 94GZ3u9eKTlEPX8AqSkNKZ7N9sAWNVxp4YtKRJ7jONtQXlbf/xZWnbHT0hBTCg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1725387164; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gQP54y+VsS5E5n+dpc3JxOTWjqN/qEltgk70Ha9nOhQ=; b=hTDKJAj72VhYm9pqNrAQ2pzdGxR5TTda/KhV7a2JqV65/72oP56Ge9Rz9T6bUArQutQqRH hPqu1w0PiLJMzijSgli0TUGNldNygngERCFafCV9iVKVp29AnM0DzompWOc1UrckjfTIxR 9DEN6BHERRLLx+giFIs9HtxyiX4pQikMh7lTiVib9J40n9atIqX6c+Shep0QOwxaSNF9TL baLhQm/e2kAjSN2Tp481G/ScA3GdX2JKleq+g6q+/1cm+Jr2Jg7sxCAeyKZ+8yAaJfyxAc pf5hf5PkrpzVj5oDDD93uFl56w56TUNH/tfn0rGFmueAbUQPiKoEcFvRZzIfQg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WytyN3lDkzrkb for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 18:12:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 483ICica052218 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 18:12:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 483ICiJr052193 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 18:12:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280701] FreeBSD-SA-24:05 fix breaks ICMP/ICMP6 states handling in pf firewall (ping, traceroute) Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 18:12:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: doktornotor@mailinator.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280701 --- Comment #66 from doktornotor --- (In reply to Gordon Tetlow from comment #65) I'm afraid the point was sort of missed here. What I meant by "more communication" is that whoever committed the buggy code should not maintain radio silence here. We do not exactly need an erratum to tell us it was bro= ken, we already know that.=20 What we do *not* know is whether those regressions are fixed - and worse ye= t, we do not know what are we supposed to test. "Letting it sit for a hot minu= te" won't get any testing done. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=