Re: pf for netgraph jails?
- Reply: Patrick M. Hausen: "Re: pf for netgraph jails?"
- Reply: Aleksandr Fedorov : "Re: pf for netgraph jails?"
- In reply to: Patrick M. Hausen: "Re: pf for netgraph jails?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:32:37 UTC
> 16 okt. 2024 kl. 18:17 skrev Patrick M. Hausen <hausen@punkt.de>: > > Hi! > >> Am 16.10.2024 um 16:19 schrieb Palle Girgensohn <girgen@FreeBSD.org>: >> [...] >> but nothing happens, everything is passed directly into the jail: >> >> nc -l 4444 (inside the jail) >> >> and I can just telnet 1.2.3.4 4444 > > Try: > > sysctl net.link.bridge.pfil_member=0 > sysctl net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge=1 > > Although I do not know if this ablies to netgraph or to if_bridge(4) only. > > But obviously your rules are not applied to the bridge interface. The default > of the tunables above is the other way round - don't filter on bridge interfaces. > > HTH, > Patrick Hallo Patrick, Thanks for the reply. It seems that these MIBs are related to if_bridge, not ng_bridge? I didn't have them at first, men after kldload if_bridge they appeared. They make no difference, though, so perhaps they do not relate to netgraph bridges? Any idea what tuneables would do the job? Thanks, Palle