From nobody Thu Oct 31 00:33:25 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Xf4jK5gt7z5Zbpf for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 00:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Xf4jK3Ptnz4YmS for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 00:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1730334805; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NDMfnzptahgdmy0Wz6NTWX5Lols4ZpV0ZQh6LYzsYss=; b=S77xHgC3n9Q/JPeirxakvuXooFvDs7bXjdsYAq7RmVvYHIfpf9+bnHL9IinGnFP+Zd0E7J w2KzAupFf4brdAOVTSMU1h/ix3NYUfnuW9Y2s9XE2geeEi/qCwcMcumsG+g02/ja47Fddx Oy4KQDnrPLfc5MObx+hypcIrWD1qvYGzUqzo27rRl5lMhrYDwciJ+g35C4jEpXqlQMGkAD B6dSNQPvD2IazsKV0RvoK7wUhS7sKaTnu2D/zC6P+Tp2zKm0bbl6ammQLMrmz5WvQ3O73d QdjkMypem6eanb8w6fn2JiBfZj3DmKRqwvOUs/Cr9RIXS+PrDXcDdQsmIkzMAg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1730334805; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ngy+iUBQNq2NWeF/IYH+EU+wltMZXQvP7juyH4BzhLZNrZP5nM8eQF8ytupyNT3mazuWjz NtaBMSuvmIB0vj5SfG41+9HHlhCN+4FkxuS4GDh/3F8PFNNxTAJXmxC+doRNSUkID516Bu Ms26cb8UUs3bq0ceHdCSbLZqWHFCddjKvZ3oIWouZzweEm6FLpTTO5OkCX3Yg1PN7s8XG0 kk/rOzOosxcfhW4SeTY7wpIp+tB6DZdDqsQQZbqXhTQhDkarpXTQ9mdZ/khN/Ek8zrICRI 6mhbNc0g8pqHkl8QP+yAsn0Jm5zDWo+NrBrUp9vvY6A4XnQBPPjsVqMS7tog3A== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Xf4jK2hTvzFDq for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 00:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 49V0XPKa075218 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 00:33:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 49V0XPIh075217 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 00:33:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 263982] IPv6 Router Advertisement - Route Information Option Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 00:33:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: dxdt@dev.snart.me X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D263982 David T changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dxdt@dev.snart.me --- Comment #4 from David T --- So I wrote this: https://github.com/dxdxdt/gists/blob/master/writeups/ipv6/rfc4191/rfc4191.md RIO is a quite recent invention in Apple products as well. Neat thing to ha= ve, if you ask me. Hopefully, I'll get to update the table soon. I find it so funny how pfSense is using RIO to push default route, but rtso= ld can't use it! lol Having said that, many legacy devices might have trouble parsing it, too. I= t's not enabled in Linux kernel by default either, so some embedded systems will have the same issue. I for one think that pfSense is in the wrong, not rtso= ld. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=