From nobody Mon Oct 28 15:24:33 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XccdD3KzPz5bT7N for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:24:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-f169.google.com (mail-lj1-f169.google.com [209.85.208.169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XccdC4QvRz3x6m for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:24:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of asomers@gmail.com designates 209.85.208.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=asomers@gmail.com; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=freebsd.org (policy=none) Received: by mail-lj1-f169.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2fb3da341c9so42366441fa.2 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 08:24:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730129085; x=1730733885; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LWrybtfN4+f2axcCbmXx1ZkUyAO2vSlv4v3tCopDAIk=; b=jqqjKoBHgqFKoz9Mq4FW4/vmJ4ze74NjDImiUE+7ho0FOEmcvUpH2KvLfAxALuXkzA shqf2HYH3kKkUFC48tjVEEVM96Pgga6y7maOOgRv9gerikXPau1mpvHC4NTGjx9Bk3Az Rzt84RlBjRZeJHIJD1HLH/TI6Mj/xfOmGSrir2h4DwgdWNjFtsuEO9QjeQ5eGVWqwioW snzhAkpLCT5aOt5EhZB14tF8NDF7GF3GHx1Oga95hf9GVs86sv1rt/OmJTBBjC4M2Lbz 9KJrDesCayEd77g6V5qiM1CoMo5htXn0TxQQAKaEcEiUnZv0mxLq6MmglgV1iLoULNme DzEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx+jjS845qTm6LPNWYxSHnC+FCT0sN/ieAQIDv1LnADVounWa9d 16Qbv9j/4BS8RKC9xgAUF409oV5SzD4tvotvideqssHose8ZjR05r68Rwybd8Ix1dU8NGYsRpqY FoWk986TdiQeWYvh62Y1KCzC7nURUA0yu X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGjvJOIJ6di1mJ/trVxZSH2CHzNnzvtLA2IkkSRrVfiYrgrAskWh7t6Rloc3IxJwVfFj3/bDbLvpqxMjhKA/Fc= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:be9f:0:b0:2fb:3bef:6233 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2fcbe08cf3bmr34359451fa.33.1730129085188; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 08:24:45 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Alan Somers Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 09:24:33 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Rustls and ktls To: FreeBSD Net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.85 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.993]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.959]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[asomers@freebsd.org,asomers@gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[freebsd.org : SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM,none]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[asomers]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[asomers@freebsd.org,asomers@gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.208.169:from]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.208.169:from] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4XccdC4QvRz3x6m X-Spamd-Bar: -- Rustls is an all-new TLS implementation written entirely in Rust. Its memory-safe design makes it inherently resistant to attacks like Heartbleed. Now, its creators are claiming that it outperforms OpenSSL, too. But it lacks support for FreeBSD's ktls. I think that adding ktls support would be an interesting and worthwhile project. Is anybody else interested? https://www.memorysafety.org/blog/rustls-performance-outperforms/