From nobody Wed Oct 23 10:03:26 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XYPkr1tfMz5b4vb for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:03:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from fhigh-b8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b8-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.159]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XYPkq2G3Yz4RRf for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:03:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm3 header.b=P66Cikvj; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=kTNo81EN; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 202.12.124.159 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm Received: from phl-compute-03.internal (phl-compute-03.phl.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B6425400F2 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 06:03:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-03.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 23 Oct 2024 06:03:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1729677809; x=1729764209; bh=WUQ9lA7Kn8 aoz2Kfr7Iarcuitu3n2O3KFiAYy/n7vNo=; b=P66CikvjYpWU/yHZ9wgUf4B1TP CE0YU0bwlBd85cFbFF6863JR1AT4rsM67p8NqzhIXiovhv+vAAFfsWY5v3+vfzVY SQZywXVusW+c2+qx+mrtyLzKVdhi95r/psWqfiCLjh2QWcrPNCYhfUcwSeOd93wb EQhLT9PtGH0B5FQtSGXL6t2eKOuQxdkGdPckO0kRqQGd15E6zA1Y076nhYQmzZQm jlIDqVPCBWxBZvr/T/sGQJXbe7+/2ElvCucRHwRx2mEo+Zgo33kF7LofQrR0aog0 rvk33u4LULDfOmBYqq/nhFZg7V5FIL0prCWTMQeuHbamn09c1ztsJNivfIfw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1729677809; x=1729764209; bh=WUQ9lA7Kn8aoz2Kfr7Iarcuitu3n 2O3KFiAYy/n7vNo=; b=kTNo81EN/EdOgTS7rBJPE9BLxettvWmzjKilLZlTwLYh nWf2C0Y24e6fti2K/UtbFVrw8FqbBtVTwK8I23W16Wlbnp5/VuOKqSfyRZRmSEiq XSfjsQ172QPqmJOTWYGzHuyLltMr+oo4OREm/xJAKG9bIAit5k6emaiw/h5EWmhy sPyRQjXjucWtSDhSooIfvys1OjKKfsZqYXm9xhcTK2U/V6zTEOWA4JKF36JJj42K B/RKJejtO+l+8anWNfLyAOQ0isYVrBV/7ccc9291Q7Sexryg1HSAzikLTGhVV0Iz HtwUCxY1MsGWkd7vM6iE7EHCYu7dQhTaNNNDqC6Rdg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvdeijedgvddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuf fkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvhhoihguuceovhhoihgusehfqdhm rdhfmheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeeluddvlefhieelfefggffhffektdehleelgf dugfdvgeekjeejuddtheehgfeunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomhepvhhoihgusehfqdhmrdhfmhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddpmh houggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepfhhrvggvsghsugdqnhgvthesfhhrvggv sghsugdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 06:03:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:03:26 +0100 From: void To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCP Success Story (was Re: TCP_RACK, TCP_BBR, and firewalls) Message-ID: References: List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.58 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.980]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:202.12.124.128/27]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[202.12.124.159:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4XYPkq2G3Yz4RRf X-Spamd-Bar: --- On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 02:00:31PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote: >So I benchmarked all available congestion control algorithms for >single download streams. The results are summarized in the table >below. Sorry for resurrecting an old thread, but I note your testing was with single streams. What are your thoughts wrt say RACK and *multiple* streams, on 14.1-p5? My context: I'm looking to get my settings right for best real-world bidirectional throughput for webdav, rsync, git, on server & client, in terms of sysctl tunables, tcp stacks, cc algos and any other resources. thanks, --