Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14
- Reply: void : "Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14"
- In reply to: void : "Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 19:57:42 UTC
What is the output from `ping` (latency) between these VMs? cc On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 11:31 AM void <void@f-m.fm> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:59:28AM -0400, Cheng Cui wrote: > > > Please re-organize your test result in before/after patch order. So that > I > > can understand and compare them. > > Sure. > > Before: > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 1] 0.00-60.02 sec 5.16 GBytes 738 Mbits/sec > > After: > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 1] 0.00-60.01 sec 4.87 GBytes 697 Mbits/sec > > I was surprised as well. These numbers seem to be within the margin of > error. > > I tested 'After' again just now: > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr > [ 5] 0.00-60.06 sec 5.15 GBytes 737 Mbits/sec 963 > sender > [ 5] 0.00-60.06 sec 5.15 GBytes 737 Mbits/sec > receiver > > iperf Done. > > I can spin up another couple of unmodified VMs if you like - they'll be > created from older stable/14 snapshots - and compare against those. > > -- > > -- Best Regards, Cheng Cui