Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge
- Reply: void : "Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge"
- In reply to: void : "Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 11:28:49 UTC
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 11:17 AM void <void@f-m.fm> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 11:08:27AM -0400, Cheng Cui wrote: > >The patch has no effect at the host if the host is a data receiver. > > In this context, the vms being tested are on a bhyve host. > > Is the host a data sender, because the tap interfaces are bridged with bge0 > on the host. Or is the host a data receiver, because data goes tapN => > bge0 and > then goes on to the iperf3 destination? > > The iperf3 destination was always a different physical machine, stable/14 > -- > > The patch is a TCP congestion control algorithm improvement. So to be clear, it only impacts a TCP data sender. These hosts are just traffic forwarders, not TCP sender/receiver. I can send you a patch for the FreeBSD 14/stable to test performance improvement. If you think FreeBSD 14.x releases are critical to your business, or you can't wait until FreeBSD 15 is released, you can file a request to add this patch in the 14.x. I think https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ is where a user can file such request. If it is approved, which I am not sure if it can be approved, then maybe it can be included in the next 14.x release. -- Best Regards, Cheng Cui