From nobody Wed Oct 16 17:39:20 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XTJB93vgGz5Yntq for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 17:39:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.147]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XTJB856YDz4njC for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 17:39:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm2 header.b=yPE7UErR; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=gXakuKJK; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 103.168.172.147 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm Received: from phl-compute-12.internal (phl-compute-12.phl.internal [10.202.2.52]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E67C13800B7 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:39:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-12.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:39:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1729100367; x=1729186767; bh=Sq+nZbnWDt ujdczfQk5+X0OX7FDdds0YBB7h1b3et3Q=; b=yPE7UErR4R3YgJjAmi4KRcnXhS AK4CcLR4KRer/Y7Y5uQ+HbybtS8m8f43O9vyaKs9ofM+5lI98mmGou6QZGBuWWMh R/zoY7pfkWSRSsXSoPHqSkLxZkWQCihUlEGmr+N6ryVMHWtMFtscbcO7x6iUNF5a bxwZSLUc1akGZayT2DvoubvQh+D2jxHIask+eF9k7pFI4RxBQHiCu17sRdjRPM// y5F64oZaSB3AJT/UsMPkNeRDpY4vfjIaz/lmjw74xIchCjsXzOSmiQZJAwppN5JO Xye4m2ld696H683XqUGZPpsz825Mr4zOwYwLv+mDVO4IPj0i7ydquWDmGhDQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1729100367; x=1729186767; bh=Sq+nZbnWDtujdczfQk5+X0OX7FDd ds0YBB7h1b3et3Q=; b=gXakuKJKtvYMLsfqx+28UO/2c29vRFpbVM3jBJc37HYA IdOIG3q+etZ2jVqGA8KdKlfkl9ehnO8WKuQBJMMoc+JPZtK4LvM2zFCBP3TvycyD 3WQ36s+HopMyZqBilMhm/zkGNbf6ZIBUjGR9fklmY0s8rsj3L+MGVzkAh38tk+5N saQQveOnktoyZVgQaorf+mnTdv36vRUlcC9Hc3ecCADU+ZIwsUmSWmOiiF8E+pSl 6ONNVjv8qZg4+2ZSkuhm8C8SLidCvJrX/xoKRDpvs54jwEoU5QyAIwi2KvpAM1lx /iizcMtlX99TKF193bnL2aHHQavSKlRo6mLyz2bGCw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvdegledgudduhecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvf fukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpehvohhiugcuoehvohhiugesfhdq mhdrfhhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekleduvdelhfeileefgffghfffkedtheelle fgudfgvdegkeejjedutdehhefgueenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgr mhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehvohhiugesfhdqmhdrfhhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupd hmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehfrhgvvggsshguqdhnvghtsehfrhgv vggsshgurdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:39:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:39:20 +0100 From: void To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge Message-ID: References: <20240912181618.7895d10ad5ff2ebae9883192@gmail.com> List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.60 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm2,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:103.168.172.128/27]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[103.168.172.147:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[103.168.172.147:from]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:151847, ipnet:103.168.172.0/24, country:AU]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4XTJB856YDz4njC X-Spamd-Bar: --- Hi, On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 09:48:58AM -0400, Cheng Cui wrote: >I am not sure if you are using FreeBSD15-CURRENT for testing in VMs. >But given your iperf3 test result has retransmissions, if you can try, there >is a recent VM friendly improvement from TCP congestion control CUBIC. > >commit ee45061051715be4704ba22d2fcd1c373e29079d I've just realised, your commit didn't land in main until 17th Sept so I'll need to buildworld etc on the bhyve *host* as it was last built on the 8th. Would this make a difference? The new vms are -current and have been built over the last couple of days, from fresh sources, so these will have your changes. The iperf3 destination is stable/14-n268832 amd64 1401502 1401502. --