From nobody Tue Oct 15 15:31:36 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XSdPQ1Tldz5YZxv for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:31:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@codenetworks.net) Received: from relayout04-q02.dominioabsoluto.net (relayout04-q02.dominioabsoluto.net [217.116.26.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XSdPP5PC5z4H8f; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@codenetworks.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from relayout04-redir.dominioabsoluto.net (relayout04-redir.dominioabsoluto.net [217.116.26.101]) by relayout04.dominioabsoluto.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XSdPM0WLSz9ym0; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 17:31:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codenetworks.net; s=domabs; t=1729006311; bh=pDMjFeM8/Tl40YjDM8SZNShVy7cnDR9rIvNHE6OXuPE=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=cATTy2DM2OGnpSO+2E/2Xuyy9Eb3pjy6ncCu/Q3hInkwyhbZi9acWMUxrlNb87waV lS6vh87Ugfa9e1c6eIMAfWUdqC+ZUeD9tQGESGgw19df5YXPp6z6Bj78RHJjEi1qre Za36+Qcwev1Uv4Tc4wAXj2tWDLejAtnUVQ7c16D4= Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [188.241.98.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sm.codenetworks.net) by relayout04-dsp.dominioabsoluto.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4XSdPH1LzXz9yKf; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 17:31:47 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Santiago Martinez List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [Bug 219918] LibAlias: implement RFC 4787 REQ 1 and 3 (full cone NAT) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 17:31:36 +0200 Message-Id: References: Cc: net@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: To: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (22A3370) X-PostalOut-Country: IP: 188.241.98.123 | Country: ES X-PostalOut-Information: AntiSPAM and AntiVIRUS on relayout04 X-PostalOut-MsgID: 4XSdPH1LzXz9yKf.A7F5E X-PostalOut-SpamCheck: no es spam, clean X-PostalOut-From: sm@codenetworks.net X-PostalOut-Watermark: 1729611109.06499@vmtpm3H6ivpSwmXVIK3jSw X-Spam-Status: No X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16371, ipnet:217.116.24.0/21, country:ES] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4XSdPP5PC5z4H8f X-Spamd-Bar: ---- +1 on using EIM and not full cone NAT. Best regards=20 Santi > On 15 Oct 2024, at 16:50, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFhttps://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219918 >=20 > --- Comment #11 from Ed Maste --- > (In reply to Kurt Jaeger from comment #10) > EIM is Endpoint Independent Mapping, an abbreviation of the flag mentioned= in > comment #8. I'd suggest avoiding "Full Cone" for the same reason as in RFC= 4787. >=20 > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are the assignee for the bug.