From nobody Thu Nov 28 19:23:46 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XzmSh6xvvz5f8fK for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:23:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XzmSh5m6Lz4m76 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:23:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1732821828; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/c7PtxpQgjWFfB1b5FyhU6NIFy6oMbpDEAhXshiWHlE=; b=fQx4TpZu45891FilmISjYRiJ8fdNytVMEMxy/PTcW9Nx4B9rZAC34PclyrP+scgK3EFzgB 88q6TfungJqoySufYQzNyO3wfDXumYI5xOjOpt22HPpfxIw2m5bjwUTJxQfB/UnvYqn2CF ZMMKm04UGkfgSJmP2332pgmRlbPrXwiQUQmh1IDg6pFWo+cMmYlBcOz4M6e6TAg6B/wm8a 6TdmL+2DxjXUaWD7fcqp1UZKuQcXoOVnaIXnZjPgsVuj45+u3p01v0nxJMjLSblzbE8/mt zLfugDaEOmzGXZ9JiWLlD8ypIjv/SwK22RXkF9uFWbM3OssCyNgT/iP+2llnEg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1732821828; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=KLbVoA4NsmaXXkeTO8YOSku99V56bmbejqMveN6WVKye1F8Lz3qbGlhTCuH/NMml27xP0x xBPairQ10djmBFpaXoDHw2X7/v3wRw5qxQATc+CZmzJTDCbLK8sN+Km/q9O6GRvBrj/znY R1f8Wvq4g0inY4L84f2fwY+ZPHEw6oXs2cTVXyXMykZxH577S7izRMUMyALgtXxpmPL+Qa /EuH4izZJBhIF4G9DQ294IDru982+13qBbIm9a+jlh0HXh99z+DUcIrqNy0cmB/eVzgdJq dauyyw97TknZYSDBgOAJ01TVQagLhRwih5wF/XQ47fqPCYRYmSBleqIh0BhegQ== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XzmSh5Mq1zrnh for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:23:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4ASJNmAY012338 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:23:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 4ASJNmkm012337 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:23:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235031] [em] em0: poor NFS performance, strange behavior Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:23:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: d8zNeCFG@aon.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235031 --- Comment #44 from Martin Birgmeier --- Here the latest results, all machines running stable/14 @ 4e8444d5750a with minor local patches. The first set is for the driver from ports, the second= for that from stable/14. In summary, the issue seems solved, the speeds are even significantly better for incoming NFS and otherwise similar. Thank you for the work, which commit was responsible for resolving this? -- Martin if_em_updated_load=3D"YES" ------------------------ from this machine to the 100 Mbit machine: 312886272 bytes in 29.55 s =3D = 10.59 Mbyte/s from this machine to the 1 Gbit machine: 312886272 bytes in 6.295 s =3D 49.= 70 Mbyte/s from the 100 Mbit machine to this machine: 391778530 bytes in 37.105 s =3D = 10.56 Mbytes/s from the 1 Gbit machine to this machine: 391413991 bytes in 15.556 s =3D 25= .16 Mbytes/s from the 100 Mbit machine to a stable/14 running in a VirtualBox on this machine: 327977408 butes in 31.119 s =3D 10.54 Mbytes/s from the 1 Gbit machine to a stable/14 running in a VirtualBox on this mach= ine: 327977408 bytes in 15.309 s =3D 21.42 Mbyte/s if_em_load=3D"YES" ---------------- from this machine to the 100 Mbit machine: 312886272 bytes in 29.293 s =3D = 10.68 Mbyte/s from this machine to the 1 Gbit machine: 312886272 bytes in 5.906 s =3D 52.= 98 Mbyte/s from the 100 Mbit machine to this machine: 327977408 bytes in 30.775 s =3D = 10.66 Mbyte/s from the 1 Gbit machine to this machine: 327977408 bytes in 5.814 s =3D 56.= 41 Mbyte/s <=3D=3D=3D significantly better from the 100 Mbit machine to a stable/14 running in a VirtualBox on this machine: 327977408 bytes in 31.728 s =3D 10.34 Mbytes/s from the 1 Gbit machine to a stable/14 running in a VirtualBox on this mach= ine: 327977408 bytes in 6.599 s =3D 49.70 Mbytes/s <=3D=3D=3D significantly bett= er --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=