Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK
- Reply: tuexen_a_freebsd.org: "Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK"
- In reply to: Nuno Teixeira : "Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:42:48 UTC
Hello all! It works just fine! System performance is OK. Using patch on main-n268841-b0aaf8beb126(-dirty). --- net.inet.tcp.functions_available: Stack D Alias PCB count freebsd freebsd 0 rack * rack 38 --- It would be so nice that we can have a sysctl tunnable for this patch so we could do more tests without recompiling kernel. Thanks all! Really happy here :) Cheers, Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> escreveu (domingo, 17/03/2024 à(s) 20:26): > > Hello, > > > I don't have the full context, but it seems like the complaint is a performance regression in bonnie++ and perhaps other things when tcp_hpts is loaded, even when it is not used. Is that correct? > > > > If so, I suspect its because we drive the tcp_hpts_softclock() routine from userret(), in order to avoid tons of timer interrupts and context switches. To test this theory, you could apply a patch like: > > It's affecting overall system performance, bonnie was just a way to > get some numbers to compare. > > Tomorrow I will test patch. > > Thanks! > > -- > Nuno Teixeira > FreeBSD Committer (ports) -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD Committer (ports)