From nobody Wed Mar 13 07:25:38 2024
X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Tvhr71SWYz5DWSt;
	Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:25:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org)
Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Tvhr64hgWz4VMq;
	Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:25:42 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:ada9:be50:695b:7583])
	(Authenticated sender: micmac)
	by drew.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DA1F721E2806;
	Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:25:39 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:freebsd-net+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:freebsd-net+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
Subject: Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK
From: tuexen@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20240313080624.6c73908c@ernst.home>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:25:38 +0100
Cc: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org>,
 current@freebsd.org,
 net@freebsd.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <508E3B47-8E1B-469F-97B1-2171A3098888@freebsd.org>
References: <42C327BD-6CE4-43AA-A1AE-3BEC08D623DB@freebsd.org>
 <CAFDf7U+U3QpgsG-hY0u3tC_X9WKSRzuAM7Nfhzu-+qPBbs1nng@mail.gmail.com>
 <486915F0-456B-4B09-A8BC-93BBA79C4CA1@freebsd.org>
 <20240313080624.6c73908c@ernst.home>
To: garyj@gmx.de
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action;
	module=replies;
	Message is reply to one we originated
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	REPLY(-4.00)[];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:193.174.0.0/15, country:DE]
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Tvhr64hgWz4VMq

> On 13. Mar 2024, at 08:06, Gary Jennejohn <garyj@gmx.de> wrote:
>=20
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:14:17 +0100
> tuexen@freebsd.org wrote:
>=20
>>> On 12. Mar 2024, at 14:39, Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> =
wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Hello,
>>>=20
>>> I'm curious about tcp RACK.
>>>=20
>>> As I do not run on a server background, only a laptop and a rpi4 for
>>> poudriere, git, browsing, some torrent and ssh/sftp connections, =
will
>>> I see any difference using RACK?
>>> What tests should I do for comparison?
>> You might want to read the following article in the FreeBSD Journal:
>> =
https://freebsdfoundation.org/our-work/journal/browser-based-edition/rack-=
and-alternate-tcp-stacks-for-freebsd/
>>=20
>> There is no specific area for testing. Just test the stack on
>> the systems you use with the workload you use and report back
>> any issues...
>>=20
>=20
> In the article we have option TCPHPTS and option TCP_RACK.  But in
> /sys/conf/NOTES we have options TCPHPTS and options TCP_RACK and
> not option.
Thanks for reporting, that is a typo in the article. It should
always read options instead of option.

Best regards
Michael
>=20
> --
> Gary Jennejohn