Re: Multiple Fibs and INET6
- In reply to: Santiago Martinez : "Multiple Fibs and INET6"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:48:22 UTC
Hi everyone, Did anyone had the chance to take a look? For me it’s a bug but before filling the PR want to know what’s your view or if it’s a limitation or bug by design. Br Santi > On 12 Jul 2024, at 19:06, Santiago Martinez <sm@codenetworks.net> wrote: > > > Hi Everyone. > > While adding -F ( fib as used in netstat ) to ping and ping6 I have found something that from my understanding is not correct. > Please can you advise? > I have the following setup : > > -- two fibs (0 and 1) > -- two loop-backs (lo0 and lo1). > -- Lo1 has been assigned to fib1 > -- net.add_addr_allfibs = 0 > My interface output looks like this: > > ifconfig lo0 | grep inet6 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > > ifconfig lo1 | grep inet6 > inet6 fe80::1%lo1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 > > > If I do a netstat -rn -6 -F0 I get the following which is was i expected. > > Internet6: > Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire > ::/96 link#2 URS lo0 > ::1 link#2 UHS lo0 > ::ffff:0.0.0.0/96 link#2 URS lo0 > fe80::%lo0/10 link#2 URS lo0 > fe80::%lo0/64 link#2 U lo0 > fe80::1%lo0 link#2 UHS lo0 > ff02::/16 link#2 URS lo0 > > > Now, netstat -rn -6 -F1 shows "fe80::1%lo0" which should not be there and "fe80::1%lo1" is missing which should be there. > Internet6: > Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire > fe80::%lo1/64 link#3 U lo1 > fe80::1%lo0 link#2 UHS lo0 > > > What output I was expecting was: > Internet6: > Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire > fe80::%lo1/64 link#3 U lo1 > fe80::1%lo1 link#3 UHS lo1 > > > > This makes the ping -6 -F0 fe80::1%lo0 to work but ping -6 -F1 fe80::1%l01 to fail which I wanted to use as test case. > > Thanks in advance. > > Santiago >