From nobody Tue Apr 16 13:24:24 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VJlBb4Zlbz5Gs3m for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 13:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (mail-lf1-f48.google.com [209.85.167.48]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VJlBZ6wKcz457G for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 13:24:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=freebsd.org (policy=none); spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.167.48 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-516d1c8dc79so5510308e87.1 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:24:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713273876; x=1713878676; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sFzlZE/fP231eOavh94QEdvMuxUevou9AH0hqKxG2MQ=; b=Pkv9/VmibnMckRSxQGhpcnSyg8Z3gRMVLeAaWV3tdKeyrTKF+wuxuZXJdz0SisV4xA Iln4bzbv69X+asSbVoSDSRl8KuCjOc4YjXf71oKUErWFZqOniWb/fBg9yWtQJqwohk2F 4QMqDHofSAZEJyFNJ2a4wxL9o3aAeJzokucOqSHt/kZyLbENXfaJTvDrRpDEJwzkusFM ImIUPb18D0H+9qaab4ml/eCSVEshVIdWzgp0qJ8B8y82N8fQbCRWlrI+leuOoNyHpXpA MQN2Zeh8XnQ/TxMyubEuRvX6dT69tvFWxkHLnK7O/wkqkhGw2Jw86AQTuoq1eOMt4xoc vMWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxtdykQ1MD7iLVE5AXxOm6e/Bl6mW4SpGqlJfRE7ZUDn7dlL4z/ B50jjWs9z/qgqNYSJbft5xZAySLDK0Xz9vyA2kdT0P60EH2wtCqyhe0pE9H5XCSNwnYmiCJTWOC aIdK4EljHJxZ5Nj4Vh8DOwgJFNEYMA8gF X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGRmoP6gKs0eSDcMgo5EtGp5Y4M/glpozp/b5hxr27Vjir8gEsKC2+bKs/go16gQi8Tztb/cm+Ru0mnBhoAVsY= X-Received: by 2002:a19:5f1e:0:b0:513:952d:ac62 with SMTP id t30-20020a195f1e000000b00513952dac62mr8399669lfb.52.1713273876049; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:24:36 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ed Maste Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:24:24 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: removing RIP/RIPng (routed/route6d) To: net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.53 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.37)[0.370]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[freebsd.org : SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM,none]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[carpeddiem]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[net@freebsd.org]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.167.48:from]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.167.48:from] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4VJlBZ6wKcz457G On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 16:49, Lexi Winter wrote: > > currently FreeBSD ships routed(8) and route6d(8) which implement the RIP > resp. RIPng routing protocols. > ... > i'd like to submit a patch to remove both of these daemons from src. if > there's some concern that people still want to use the BSD > implementation of routed/route6d, i'm also willing to submit a port such > as net/freebsd-routed containing the old code, in a similar way to how > the removal of things like window(1) and telnetd(8) were handled. I agree that retiring these makes sense, and I've added a note about the proposed removal to https://wiki.freebsd.org/DeprecationPlan. Once there's consensus we should add deprecation notices to the man pages and MFC those to stable/14 and stable/13.