Re : Re: netgraph and vpp

Thanks for your answer. So i guess if we want to build a modern router without custom code, vpp is the way to go in term de performance?

One thing i really miss ito cross connect 2 interfaces without using a bridge. Somethibg really easy and performant with vpp...

Benoit
Le sam. 25 nov. 2023 à 00:33, Jim Thompson <[jim@netgate.com](mailto:Le sam. 25 nov. 2023 à 00:33, Jim Thompson <<a href=)> a écrit :

> On Nov 24, 2023 at 12:48:07 AM, Benoit Chesneau <benoitc@enki-multimedia.eu> wrote:
>
>> netgraph and vpp looks similar in their intent. Both are graphs to process packets.
>>
>> I thought that usinv netgraph sounds interresting to build a modern router or cpe. What about the perforance? Did anyone compRe? Also is there any difference in term of implementation of the processing? Id there any recent paper about netgraph?
>
> They are very, very different. Netgraph is closer to AT&T streams, but with mbufs.
>
> Netgraph would probably be better implemented these days as a set of netmap modules, ala
> https://github.com/zeek/packet-bricks or https://github.com/outscale/packetgraph (this one is DPDK, but similar architecture)