From nobody Mon May 15 22:19:17 2023 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QKv131Z5Nz4B9Rj for ; Mon, 15 May 2023 22:19:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QKv12617Xz3FMd for ; Mon, 15 May 2023 22:19:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1684189158; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sZeEs9tuflomXC4ij5lzv9+umQaAGD2Rvl/xbHMP1y0=; b=r3YjRkoN2jjelkAP2yuAh9D8/as2/LtEkNS5dqtHjgJfFO4wnDEiUL7AhtW4RsH3wt+4n4 gBzzD9vGBep0MAjxfyTnpLYNy0ivQ5NHiOcrxXQMYcgjhqfQ7K2wJAwDH4oubh7yfk3JLd PhjMMzhDkaaHehjrv5GVEaDzx7k6aE17ycLIbkSi1RgeFc7d6Ei46hTh4eds6GgG1B6P8+ iNJo896WGCvPTwWcwcMHaRP5oYVKJfiMZRMbGRPKFXG+qj2TTftj3A1XvQFchc98ggg/2y 5uYjcn+qPS7Bs9PHNqLxeh57VMFFplo0XfuZ75f8tSFgHnXC5l7SR1qbPUKiaw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1684189158; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=C2ZcSnepWrBNxVIUICTc9vMPTX/MAzTbkXwpaJamrF5rfWKuR61E6W5hDz9PQBmQasU6NL BzZqJs56hwvuABVPawU0wn/8zYslMFFsPF1YoLR6NhoTY13nOxreruQDxIdL9SmZbKSB3i NZ2XbBiKp321g4QKjwobIJ4ltG5BdlEMu5Tc5VUvaekj6ovWQgzkUGCpb4qNyKFGJEWfwn +G/BK/pQ8emkIT37PL3Lj+9aw+XpAlP29Cj98O1cKyGv4H6wLE/g1K588YsRyQckdqW8ZH 2Y3NzG1JnC3G+62vtMIkNfa83V3+eWpDN4XfQLA/GATYTXJXuL4mPpE9qVgJ4A== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QKv1251NHzxRB for ; Mon, 15 May 2023 22:19:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 34FMJIpH034289 for ; Mon, 15 May 2023 22:19:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 34FMJIxV034288 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 22:19:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 271371] e1000 driver falsely reports that it supports LRO Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 22:19:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: erj@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D271371 Eric Joyner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erj@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Eric Joyner --- I don't understand this bug? The IFCAP_LRO capability gets passed to iflib via the isc_capenable/isc_capabilities fields via the driver's if_softc_ctx_t objec= t, then those are used in a if_setcapabilities/if_setcapenable() call in iflib when the driver loads. Then iflib sets up the lro context and handles sendi= ng packets via LRO's tcp_lro_rx() instead of the regular if_input() routine. iflib ends up handling most of it, but the driver still needs to set IFCAP_= LRO if it wants iflib to use LRO. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=