From nobody Fri Apr 14 22:30:39 2023 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PyrkT2Shtz44wbk for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:30:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PyrkT0hMhz44ck for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:30:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1681511441; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AwiowNoDa+fZYet4C2zWsEXrXMI5AnfWmeYrKj5baC8=; b=ZNW3oW1aLoSTWrkwy2Fkqtcdu1ahP1eIxEk4em3XroXc769bkFbJw96/7Lt47eWTwwZ+ZN g1H5cRefPSU17/yJZQA5lHNPdOxjlWombWRpRtuPIyShwHnGUgZaH/ULZr2+FFH9yxUTpq cZDubevotUj87K+PXATyjZYSwtD+cZJW5sbH6DKtDMFmHAZoqDZpPK6NRaCwR3qwH3cNRd L/AJ7U8GkEFlf8w/TCD12eTXCCCM3+l3Xk0JExtcDcn5MvhTIu5cuxdjHoCWlqRyqOKo6v gtq0Qag6FFNHXLEZVuFr65zCmdpLnuubiZ04yPGmFp4OoVj/MjLSN38/oOgG5w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1681511441; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Js+opGolxCCEgVNx15ABhU3zhS8ZPEIjiUF0cC7n4ZP/ayWblZ5Ng/3jTBzLTEhNF2occC rTZNNQOQZBekacqeg5ZlTwG4ML9PkRp33TKd7qkW28dNAn76zVC3cEGTwbN5lFW/ME2TOK uBVRxfPM5XdmfTk64c1DN7+8YJ3kpiZvSzawDrvhE+JJcOhqTGPTP6W12BtLfHuj9QstGi TzTBlBXm6mr3Rg6wgSDkBUD9WAL2tiIXXwWu6jwRC+bBG8BLGMAji2J7dMY5g44+/lmR0q YNHfW4tS6mMZsdV4UQsx7pcQVTjrcrshHCP9q5R/J0WcOHN+ntZbHxfweI5i4w== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PyrkS6vrkzht4 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:30:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 33EMUeOC025048 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:30:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 33EMUeYZ025047 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:30:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 268490] [igb] [lagg] [vlan]: Intel i210 performance severely degraded Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:30:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.4-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: duerrd561@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268490 --- Comment #46 from Daniel Duerr --- (In reply to Santiago Martinez from comment #43) Hi Santiago, Both 172.27.6.129 and 172.27.6.135 are on the same MTU 9000 storage subnet.= I was careful to ensure this for my testing. All of my iperf tests, both fail= ures and successes, have been between these 2 IPs on a properly configured MTU 9= 000 vlan which only has hosts on it using MTU 9000. Also, and FWIW, this storage subnet was configured to MTU 9000 long before = this issue ever started occurring. It is a mature, known-good, config. Best, Daniel --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=