Re: page fault in pfioctl
- In reply to: Andriy Gapon : "Re: page fault in pfioctl"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 16:43:35 UTC
On 25/09/2021 19:38, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 25/09/2021 19:34, Kristof Provost wrote: >> On 25 Sep 2021, at 18:25, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> On 13/06/2021 11:19, Kristof Provost wrote: >>>> On 13 Jun 2021, at 09:41, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>>> Based on >>>>> the panic message (page fault with non-sleepable locks held), it seems that >>>>> the problem is with holding the lock across the copyout. Usually that >>>>> won't panic, but if the destination happens to be paged out... And only >>>>> with INVARIANTS, I guess... >>>> >>>> Oh right. Thanks. I’ve gotten bitten by that one before, but had clearly >>>> garbage collected the memory. >>>> >>>> I’ll fix this one and check for others on Monday. >>>> >>>> I’ll also see of we can persuade copyout to always panic on this bug, not >>>> just when the destination memory is actually paged out. That way we’ll catch >>>> this in the regression tests in the future. >>> >>> I upgraded to the latest stable/13 and hit a fresh panic of the same type. >>> This time it's in pf_getstatus() and it's a copyout while 'pf rulesets' lock >>> is held. >>> >> I believe that’s fixed by >> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/sys/netpfil/pf/pf_ioctl.c?id=cb13059663e455b3fc69c293dadec53c164490dc >> > > Thank you for the pointer! > I believe it should help with the witness warning. > Still not sure what's going on with copyout_nosmap_std(). > Ah, sorry for the noise, trap_fatal() is exactly because the witness did not like the fault. -- Andriy Gapon