[Bug 258527] wpa_supplicant(8) from the base is not able to bring up wlan(4) interface correctly due to SIGSEGV after EAP/PEAP MSCHAPv2 authentication
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:18:19 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258527 Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Affects Some People |Affects Only Me --- Comment #16 from Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> --- We should all take it easy, it is a minor breakage and probably no other setups except mine are affected. On the other hand, the security/wpa_supplicant from ports still works as intended. The QA process takes some time, the same for debugging and writing patches, but also taking dumps and testing patches requires some time and effort including either driving tens of miles or recreating EAP/PEAP secured network in the home lab. I have no insight into @freebsd.org e-mail server setup, but believe it does some false positives marking messages as SPAM what makes writing direct email messages a bit hopeless. The first conclusion: "no other setups are probably affected" is pretty sad and means that FreeBSD's user base became FreeBSD's consumer base. I have reported this breakage a week or two ago on the net@ mailing list and there was no feedback at all. The FreeBSD consumer base utilizes probably only RELEASEs and cares neither for the development process nor for the quality of the upcoming product. The final question which comes here is: Do we really need wpa_supplicant in the base? I was against ftpd(8) removal which IMHO is an imminent part of the FreeBSD OS, but wpa_supplicant can be easily installed from ports. Consumers who have only WiFi access can have the package on the USB stick. Kind regards, FreeBSD User -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.