Re: Porting OpenBSD MPLS to FreeBSD
- Reply: Zaphod Beeblebrox : "Re: Porting OpenBSD MPLS to FreeBSD"
- In reply to: Rodney W. Grimes: "Re: Porting OpenBSD MPLS to FreeBSD"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 16:26:42 UTC
Hi Neel, it is exciting to see the topic coming alive again. Once you think is good/ready for testing, or when you require it, i can avail hardware , routers and traffic generator to take the stack for a ride. Count me in for testing, reporting, etc. Best regards. Santi On 12/6/21 18:40, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ] >> Hi Alexander, >> >> On 2021-12-04 10:42, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: >>>> * Is porting OpenBSD MPLS to FreeBSD feasible, or are we better off >>>> doing a from-scratch implementation based on netgraph? >>> It depends. MPLS implementaiton can be splitted into multiple logical >>> parts - dataplane (input, control, output, forward) and control plane >>> (programming ip routes+mpls and mpls-only fowarding state). Some parts >>> of the former can indeed be imported from OpenBSD. However, most of >>> the control plane part have to be written from scratch. Finally, it >>> may be desired to maintain an programming interface close to the one >>> already implemented in major routing SW (frr, bird) - I guess that >>> would be simpler to achieve with native, non-netgraph implementation. >> Thanks for your description. I haven't started work yet, but I'd >> probably import the dataplane from OpenBSD where I can and do a new >> control plane, maybe that with a FRR/Bird-compatible API. > When you get to working with FRR let me know, I am a member of > the CI infustructure team there and can hook you up directly > with very knowledgeable FRR developers. > >> I wasn't too keen on using netgraph anyways, I felt it was unnecessary >> complexity. > True, but with that complexity comes an ulmost unlimited flexiablity. > >> If I were to work on this, would I be better off starting with the >> dataplane or control plane? > I concur with Alexander on this, dataplace first, with an eye on how > FRR/Bird interact with the dataplane. > >>>> * Would some of the other committers here be willing to mentor/help me >>>> if needed? >>> I?d love to. Most of my the routing-related stack changes (modular >>> lookup framework, nexthops, rtsock cleanups) were done to enable >>> efficient kernel-based MPLS implementation. >> Thanks! >> >> -Neel (nc@) >> >>