Re: why multi-hop icmp redirects to 0.0.0.0 on 13.0 ?
- In reply to: Lutz Donnerhacke : "Re: why multi-hop icmp redirects to 0.0.0.0 on 13.0 ?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2021 21:51:04 UTC
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote: > On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 08:20:08PM +0200, John Hay wrote: >> Something I have observed is that if you use FreeBSD 13 as a router with 2 >> subnets on the same interface, it will generate redirects when hosts send >> packets to the other subnet via the FreeBSD router. I think it is wrong. > > No, it's correct. > >> The host does not have a more direct way to get to the other subnet. > > The other host can arp for an address in a non-connected network on the > interface because it's the same L2 domain. Hence the ICMP redirect is send > out to provide the shortcut (skipping the router). That has always be a very Linux-y approach; FreeBSD should not ARP for any subnet it is not connected to (at least it didn't use to). I think you could add a host route in the past and then it would but with the current IPv4 I couldn't even say from quickly looking what it would do. >> RFC792 >> on page 13 does not talk about interfaces, but networks, "If G2 and the >> host identified by the internet source address of the datagram are on the >> same network...". > > "network" == "layer 2 domain". No, no in this context; it talks about about the "internet source address of a datagram" and hence network == Layer 3 as that is where internet addresses belong. No one would phrase it anymore like this these days but in those days ... /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7