[Bug 259787] sched.h: unknown type name 'cpu_set_t' after 160b4b922b6021848b6b48afc894d16b879b7af2
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:29:31 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259787 --- Comment #11 from Evgeniy Khramtsov <evgeniy@khramtsov.org> --- 14-CURRENT as of base 20aa35977 still can't build: benchmarks/iperf3 [...] iperf_api.c:4460:5: error: unknown type name 'cpu_set_t'; did you mean 'cpuset_t'? cpu_set_t cpu_set; ^~~~~~~~~ cpuset_t /usr/include/sys/_cpuset.h:50:24: note: 'cpuset_t' declared here typedef struct _cpuset cpuset_t; ^ graphics/cairo [...] cairo-perf-micro.c:418:5: error: unknown type name 'cp u_set_t'; did you mean 'cpusetid_t'? cpu_set_t affinity; ^~~~~~~~~ cpusetid_t /usr/include/sys/types.h:86:22: note: 'cpusetid_t' declared here typedef __cpusetid_t cpusetid_t; ^ cairo-perf-micro.c:421:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'sched_getaffinity' is inva lid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] if (sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(affinity), &affinity)) { ^ cairo-perf-micro.c:426:35: error: use of undeclared identifier 'CPU_SETSIZE' for(i = 0, cpu_count = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; ++i) { ^ cairo-perf-micro.c:427:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'CPU_ISSET' is invalid in C 99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] if (CPU_ISSET(i, &affinity)) ^ 4 errors generated. graphics/mesa-devel [...] src/util/libmesa_util.a.p/u_cpu_detect.c.o -MF src/util/libmesa_util.a.p/u_cpu_detect.c.o.d -o src/util/libmesa_util.a.p/u_cpu_detect.c.o -c ../src/util/u_cpu_detect.c ../src/util/u_cpu_detect.c:613:11: error: implicit declaration of function 'sched_getaffinity' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] if (sched_getaffinity(getpid(), sizeof(affin), &affin) == 0) ^ ../src/util/u_cpu_detect.c:613:11: note: did you mean 'cpuset_getaffinity'? /usr/include/sys/cpuset.h:159:5: note: 'cpuset_getaffinity' declared here int cpuset_getaffinity(cpulevel_t, cpuwhich_t, id_t, size_t, cpuset_t *); ^ 1 error generated. Passing -D_WITH_CPU_SET_T to port's CFLAGS resolves this, but is this the intended behavior for porters to consider after base 90fa9705d ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.