From nobody Wed Sep 04 14:30:03 2024 X-Original-To: java@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WzPyz3Xv5z5V0yx for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 14:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WzPyz0rkBz4CQr for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 14:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1725460203; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=CQB7qbdEkN/jnqu34T5SyDZaoGBBrSHJMv/KhzeRP1FL6CloLBmnzsBmrWhYrvjp7M16Bq 09DB/IAIqMjdlVfCfXpzUMXgnGyMdg4GfFZFCjLhZjCJfhhgjpPcVbQbDWV5PcrlIEujNQ 31/Vpt41EO5Z4TeBaejB6E1gVqC0OxluVS0kyXn5B1u0PpZuqwX/8+VjQZHNDO1Nib2J7L g6vwfM6NlUgecOImHXpvhQZuAzqD0MtAznk17wTAn+D+a+ekeTUdiKfLP2BYn8kQFJDdKd NutIdaFQcs9ThC+UTVRADVYNT1ZyqnwnYeuYoIxbkLxGjeENaNarXxe8vTAHpw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1725460203; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nNxvqdKJcFUsa5KFmfUp9aKrOSn9lH7CFjkLdg35oTU=; b=YU3B/GfNGDBuua2eLKAMpdT7VLcFZiXo15nDL5fVaxhfremHzpiLKN2k0a3YHdUQudLRNB a+x7RcEcGcWdHpL/MdskdUrY91Z4VUQNRolK4fN+VKbSTJODutzKPN8CqKl+0nWjIq9xZm 7i2to/4rqu/lzLBNIV5OIqgMyffDGCGv7hhC0CfIuH6v0FIvvnNBUjjjCngCceq6NR5o1X 9MtItOZ9/TilKkvvVpnkQoc1KbOMLxdX8kQF4iPboAnVNO0QgYGqAYj2A0TA4OplLQ6pio 5xRbVS2BnQ+DMEqIidPJLhnrYMyh5eOuCQ58JyL9FDPbhmL4TDEJ2QKkTW9vxw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WzPyz07n6zSW9 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 14:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 484EU2xx005821 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 14:30:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 484EU2hu005820 for java@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 14:30:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 279367] java/openjdk11 -- respect compiler and linker flags, allow building with gcc Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 14:30:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, patch-ready X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: freebsd-2024@virtual-estates.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: java@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-java List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D279367 --- Comment #9 from Mikhail T. --- > The mechanism is to create a good patch and notify the maintainer of a po= rt. After two weeks the patch can be committed by somebody else stating 'ma= intainer timeout' (this is documented somewhere). You describe, how things should be, but they aren't. This PR is over 3 mont= hs old... Some of the changes I initially proposed were made independently, the committer evidently not even aware of this PR. Something is broken in our system -- something, portmgr@ should be fixing, in my not so humble opinion. > After two weeks the patch can be committed by somebody else stating 'main= tainer timeout' Yes, I've done "maintainer timeout" commits too. But I cannot any more, bec= ause portmgr@ took away my commit-bit. > I would advice to first commit this patch.=20 Full agreement here. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=