From nobody Thu Jan 05 09:08:24 2023 X-Original-To: ipfw@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NngcS11j7z2r83L for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 09:08:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NngcR69Fnz3Bvv for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 09:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1672909703; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4qA9PfWZS6s2NBJUIslnsX1fFvDh01s729oh+uWPiOU=; b=hAppg8teZfP62KGSlMATXvvmgMpo2RjAtvwbJOrQW1I3s//WSfVNH+R8hnmXhdFjOLhj+W ZTrr/8nXQ9dU+0seKQN78jFPZUBt28p56ll9IQAwAANJGmgQ/fxOkitjC7fw1hHWBj6dcZ RIgDf9mii8pqIFMDuTXPumKuP9HbwX67MHBaEroLL6IJD/Kj0ePt7MymZ90LDlwR/rvY64 JcqSOOam/mHLheZcK6WkpzCp+GH43lt/jIpJxz9Hp5J4rYkO4yFM/ymt6Fx7wpeS6/U1cO 0902y/CkFEj7YQbFwtpV8PDaPXGHGfHAQG03bL+34+Ut737hwfMA+9T9DaBEsw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1672909703; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Z22KQ8E0UNW6NGErXDfmtOqmrgTZM7eQWvavs/bgBugd50YaEhb2B6uyTJrfw9MuPfF7Xe 0giXroi0+TQb9JVJwjlamOEBaQV494BpzAyvP65k/7SeLvRtmL/cY3FIIiSxLXs59iogLL o0WHg2JKbao451Al3MLeCMkq5zMmZEKj/PFV0u6Mx3wwwHHGEyKaiZoEXKrgfEEUl7ZFe7 7i1kWKsF6Ljtdbq/vOrZGQ7tOEsd0sd0qbGa5MT7cU4/EZSSZPpcgujCMTHY1y9uVd7TMu LvjbuR8N+Uc5UF80WJGYAm6InhWmg0ea6rbfYCp+CjVwryoNyiTzZK9U9sORnQ== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NngcR5D3xzl18 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 09:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 30598NHv088355 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 09:08:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 30598NlU088354 for ipfw@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 09:08:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ipfw@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 267278] ipfw mask addr:mask syntax creates wrong rule Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2023 09:08:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ipfw@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ipfw List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D267278 --- Comment #7 from Marek Zarychta --- (In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #6) Thank you again for the reply in this educational and explanatory PR Andrey= .=20 I am still working on making IPFW and PF better work together with regard to nat64lsn, but it's not officially supported and seems to be a bit tricky. T= he initial results are almost satisfying. So far, for many years, I have been using IPFW for dummynet and PF for the = rest of packet processing and it worked flawlessly, now PF has dummynet support,= but no NAT64 capabilities, so still IPFW is indispensable. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=