Re: CC.freebsd.org mirrors still relevant?
- In reply to: John Hay : "Re: CC.freebsd.org mirrors still relevant?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 05:08:59 UTC
On 2024-05-28 12:35:54 (+0800), John Hay wrote: > On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 06:04, Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org> wrote: >> We (clusteradm) have been actively trying to phase out the cc.f.o >> mirrors in favour of our own CDN with clusteradm-managed mirrors. >> While >> the asynchronous cc.f.o mirrors served us well in the 1990s and early >> 2000s, our synchronised CDN is a better fit for the world we >> currently >> live in. >> >> Currently we have 14 sites around the world. We could use more. We >> only have one mirror in Africa at JINX. >> >> If anyone wants to provide a {download,pkg,www}.FreeBSD.org site, >> please >> get in touch. We're particularly keen to hear from sites who can >> provide hardware as well as connectivity. > > So for interest sake at least, what do you need in terms of hardware? > Does > it have to be physical? What would be needed in terms of access? Do > you > then maintain the software side? Or is there a writeup about it > somewhere? The setup at JINX is a single-machine installation, Intel E3-1220 v6, 32G memory, 8x4T drives. For new installations, we'd probably prefer more memory -- we have at least 128G in the newer mirrors. We need at least 12T usable space. We like mirrored pairs for both reliability and disk I/O parallelism. We need naked internet - legacy and IPv6. For single-machine installations, we usually get a /28 on the 20th century internet and a /64 on the 21st century internet. In most sites, we rarely fill a 1G circuit. There's a somewhat detailed writeup here: https://wiki.freebsd.org/Teams/clusteradm/generic-mirror-layout We manage the entire system. We only need local support if hardware breaks. The ZA mirror is fairly lightly loaded, and is well connected to most of southern Africa. I see 50-60ms latency from machines in TZ and KE and downloads at 40ish Mbit/s. I don't think another mirror in ZA would add much value. I don't have as convenient ways to test in northern/western Africa, but I would be surprised if the situation weren't much worse... I'd love a mirror in e.g. Lagos, Accra, or Dakar for faster downloads there. Philip