Re: wg ifconfing control

From: Peter 'PMc' Much <pmc_at_citylink.dinoex.sub.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 16:17:43 UTC
On 2025-01-23, Bertrand Petit <freebsd-hackers@phoe.frmug.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 08:24:08AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> 
>> Isn't that program already horrible and complex enough, in terms
>> of source code, manual page and command line options ?

Thanks for speaking it out.
I already moved all my bridges and guests and virtuals to netgraph,
where I can find them again. It's much nicer to have a separate
plane of existance where one can put things together independent
from the ifconfig moloch.

> 	And buggy, see [1]. Reported Oct. 2021 and still present.

Ups, is that a bug?
I got used to the scans sometimes either returning nothing or not
returning at all. The link itself now functioning, I thought this
an acceptable tradeoff.

cheerio,
PMc