Re: That's how (why) BSD is dying (Was: BPF64)

Vadim Goncharov writes:

> Because - and I've written that from the beginning - wrong architecture
> will cost too much if your code already exists, than if fixed before
> that. So I've received worthy feedback describing problems; not that
> were good solutions yet, though...

And when people do not agree with your proposed architecture "FreeBSD is dying!!!1!!" ?

> Not you. FreeBSD already had precedent when already written and
> committed code framework for device sensors was removed:
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2007-October/082398.html
> and that happened by exactly the same person with similar tone (not you).

Yes, I will resist all bad architecture.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.