Re: That's how (why) BSD is dying (Was: BPF64)
- Reply: Vadim Goncharov : "Re: That's how (why) BSD is dying (Was: BPF64)"
- In reply to: Vadim Goncharov : "That's how (why) BSD is dying (Was: BPF64)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:55:15 UTC
On Tuesday, September 10, 2024, Vadim Goncharov <vadimnuclight@gmail.com> wrote: > > > What's the point to waste resources on writing thing that is known to > be not accepted to base system from the very beginning? what's the point of talking about thing you're never going to write/finish even if it was accepted? Or even bikesheds are in short supply now? have you considered calling it eBPF++ or BPF128? at any rate, don't claim the sky is falling on the grounds that I think your proposal is far fetched if you think you've got a great idea and have a need for it, then write it and use it - if other people adopt it, even better all the best to your endeavors and don't let the naysayers hold you back -Rob