Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative
- Reply: Vadim Goncharov : "Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative"
- Reply: Bob Bishop : "Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative"
- In reply to: Vadim Goncharov : "BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 06:38:50 UTC
-------- Vadim Goncharov writes: > I've put a sketch of design to https://github.com/nuclight/bpf64 with files: Counter proposal: 1. Define the Lua execution environment in the kernel. 2. Add syscall to submit a precompiled Lua program (as bytecode) 3. Add syscall to execute submitted Lua program And yes: I'm being 100% serious. If we are going to reinvent "Channel Programs" 67 years after IBM came up with them for their 709 vacuum tube computer, at the very least we should use a sensible language syntax. Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.