From nobody Mon Sep 09 14:21:04 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X2TXS1bCqz5WVt8 for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 14:21:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan@digitaldaemon.com) Received: from digitaldaemon.com (digitaldaemon.com [162.217.114.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4X2TXR61m5z4VJ3 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 14:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan@digitaldaemon.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: (qmail 50082 invoked by uid 89); 9 Sep 2024 14:21:05 -0000 Received: from c-69-142-153-99.hsd1.nj.comcast.net (HELO ?10.0.0.22?) (jan@digitaldaemon.com@69.142.153.99) by digitaldaemon.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2024 14:21:05 -0000 Message-ID: <5ee1059e-cc6b-4b75-a568-b06ba3042d2d@digitaldaemon.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 10:21:04 -0400 List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: The Case for Rust (in any system) To: Poul-Henning Kamp , David Chisnall Cc: Warner Losh , Kristof Provost , Alan Somers , Dmitry Salychev , FreeBSD Hackers References: <202409082111.488LBTtI074660@critter.freebsd.dk> <202DD893-B152-4B38-AE9B-862E08785396@freebsd.org> <202409090739.4897d92v078621@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Language: en-US From: Jan Knepper In-Reply-To: <202409090739.4897d92v078621@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:162.217.112.0/22, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4X2TXR61m5z4VJ3 On 9/9/24 03:39, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > -------- > David Chisnall writes: >> On 8 Sep 2024, at 22:11, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >>> The logical progression of C++ adoption would start with using a C++ >>> compiler as a better C compiler. >> Compiling C as C++ will *normally* give the same output, but not always. > But do you agree that the C++ compiler's take on things make more sense > than the C compiler's in these cases ? > Yes.