Re: The Case for Rust (in any system)
- Reply: David Chisnall : "Re: The Case for Rust (in any system)"
- In reply to: David Chisnall : "Re: The Case for Rust (in any system)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 13:32:23 UTC
-------- David Chisnall writes: > On 9 Sep 2024, at 12:24, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > > > >> What might that subset be? > > > > Initially it will be "better C compiler", but then we will gradually > > allow more and more of C++ to be used. > > In my experience, the worst C++ code is written by people thinking in C. > The second worst is written by people thinking in Java (or Smalltalk). I dont disagree :-) But it's either a gradual approach or "never" because a rewrite in toto wont happen. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.