Re: The Case for Rust (in any system)
- Reply: David Chisnall : "Re: The Case for Rust (in any system)"
- In reply to: David Chisnall : "Re: The Case for Rust (in any system)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 08:14:06 UTC
-------- David Chisnall writes: > On 9 Sep 2024, at 08:39, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > > > > But do you agree that the C++ compiler's take on things make more sense > > than the C compiler's in these cases ? > > I'm not sure I've seen many places where it makes a difference. To me, > most of the benefit of C++ comes from the ability to create types > that enforce invariants. I fully agree, but I am not talking about reaping "most of the benefits", I'm talking about "how to get started with C++" and if it is worth it ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.