Re: FreeBSD+samba as a time machine server for OSX/Sonoma?
- Reply: Andrea Venturoli : "Re: FreeBSD+samba as a time machine server for OSX/Sonoma?"
- Reply: David Chisnall : "Re: FreeBSD+samba as a time machine server for OSX/Sonoma?"
- In reply to: David Chisnall : "Re: FreeBSD+samba as a time machine server for OSX/Sonoma?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 09:51:00 UTC
On 07Sep24, David Chisnall apparently wrote: > I believe this was broken by a macOS update around February. > > I recently tried to upgrade to samba419 and so far I'm unsuccessful. The error is > > "The backup disk image could not be created" and I'm running 14.1. I'm going to ask a silly question here. But why are people running samba instead of netatalk if they are only using the timemachine backup capability? I often had difficulting with Samba and timemachine and then I stumbled across an article on how to use netatalk - sorry, link is lost now, but I can provide configs - and I've never looked back. Timemachine backups and restores work flawlessly and have done so across a number of previous macOS versions. I have nothing against Samba, but it's kinda the swiss-army knife of network file systems with plenty of complexity, whereas netatalk seems much more specific and simpler. What am I missing? Mark.