Re: Rust: kernel vs user-space

On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 04:43:31PM -0700, Jacques Fourie wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 3:41 PM Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 03:15:22PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > > In message <78BC157F-6E30-49C4-931D-9EB539BD0322@digitaldaemon.com>,
> > Jan
> > > Kneppe
> > > r writes:
> > > > D
> > > >
> > > > www.dlang.org
> > >
> > > The problem with D is data structure definitions need to also be
> > mirrored
> > > (duplicated) in D. For example, when 64-bit inodes were implemented D
> > > failed to build and generate any code. The reason for this was
> > > ufs/ufs/inode.h now defined 64-bit inodes while the D representation as
> > > provided by the D language were still 32-bit. I had opened an issue with
> > > upstream regarding this. To this day they still haven't figured out how
> > to
> > > implement 64-bit inodes on newer FreeBSD systems while maintaining
> > 32-bit
> > > inode backward compatibility on older FreeBSD systems (as FreeBSD
> > > implemented this using ifunc).
> >
> > Rust is same.  It still uses pre-ino64 bindings for both stdlib and libc.
> >
> 
> Looking at the Rust libc bindings I see the following:
> https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/blob/72c40004a3568849055c0bab5c92c9975b4eb132/src/unix/bsd/freebsdlike/freebsd/freebsd11/mod.rs#L8
> https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/blob/72c40004a3568849055c0bab5c92c9975b4eb132/src/unix/bsd/freebsdlike/freebsd/freebsd12/mod.rs#L5
> 
> Seems to have changed to 64 bit for FreeBSD 12 and up?

Rust libc seems to make some strange things to follow FreeBSD ABI
evolution, which is not done e.g. for glibc.  But anyway, the relevant place
to look seems to be a comment and decision code at
https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/blob/72c40004a3568849055c0bab5c92c9975b4eb132/build.rs#L44

By default they seems to use FreeBSD 11 ABI from freebsd11 module still.
I do not know what is CARGO_FEATURE_RUSTC_DEP_OF_STD.