Re: Direct dumped kernel cores
- In reply to: Justin Hibbits : "Re: Direct dumped kernel cores"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 01:39:41 UTC
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024, 7:07 PM Justin Hibbits <jhibbits@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:33:39 -0700 > Ravi Pokala <rpokala@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > Hi Justin, > > > > So, this is like the 'crashkernel' thing Linux has, where it kexec()s > > an alternate kernel when the main one panics? > > If your description is accurate, then probably. I don't know if the > crashkernel thing from Linux existed when this was started, and > actually hadn't even heard of it until now. > Yeah. There's three types of kernels: debug, crash, and replacement. > > > I haven't looked at the patch -- most of it will be way out of my > > expertise -- but what, if anything, is done to make sure the on-disk > > state of the target filesystem is okay, before the "rescue" kernel > > starts writing to it? > > Good question. The rescue kernel embeds its own small rootfs it fscks > the target fs before writing to it. > Yea. My loader.kboot loads the kernel and initrd too... Warner > - Justin > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ravi (rpokala@) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org > > <mailto:owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org>> on behalf of Justin Hibbits > > <jhibbits@FreeBSD.org <mailto:jhibbits@FreeBSD.org>> Date: Thursday, > > October 31, 2024 at 15:23 To: <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org > > <mailto:freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>>, <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org > > <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>> Subject: Direct dumped kernel cores > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > At Juniper we've been using a so-called 'rescue' kernel for dumping > > vmcores directly to the filesystem after a panic. We're now > > contributing this feature, implemented by Klara Systems, to FreeBSD, > > and looking for feedback. I posted a review > > at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D47358 > > <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D47358> for anyone interested. > > > > > > Interesting bits to keep in mind: > > * It requires a 2-stage build process, one to build the rescue kernel, > > the other to build the main kernel, which embeds the rescue kernel > > inside its image. This might need some further work. > > * Thus far it's been implemented for amd64 and arm64, once proven out, > > other architectures (powerpc64/le, riscv64) can follow suit. > > * Kernel environment bits to pass down to the rescue kernel are > > prefixed `debug.rescue.`, for instance > > `debug.rescue.vfs.root.mountfrom`. > > > > > > There are many more details in the review summary. > > > > > > We'd love to get feedback from anyone interested. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Justin Hibbits > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >