Re: The Case for Rust (in the base system)
- In reply to: Kristof Provost : "Re: The Case for Rust (in the base system)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 17:21:55 UTC
-------- Kristof Provost writes: > > Why would such a test-tool live in src rather than ports ? > > > > It's entirely reasonable for the test code to live in the same > repository as the code it tests. "reasonable" is a very wishy-washy standard :-) My view is that test-decriptions SHALL live with the code they test. But there is no particular reason why the test-tool, which interprets those test-descriptions and perform the test as described need to. Insisting they do so, also, almost by definition, limits their abilities. For instance a test-tool living in src cannot have a graphical UX. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.