Re: Periodic rant about SCHED_ULE
- Reply: Peter 'PMc' Much: "Re: Periodic rant about SCHED_ULE"
- In reply to: Mateusz Guzik : "Re: Periodic rant about SCHED_ULE"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 22:16:02 UTC
Am 30.03.23 um 20:50 schrieb Mateusz Guzik: > Anyhow after sending the above e-mail an actual solution hit me: the X > server can tell the kernel what processes connect to it over the unix > socket, which again very well may be good enough. > > In the reports I got I found pulseaudio, this one may need to be > patched in a similar manner. Pulseaudio shouldn't need such stuff since it would either try to go into a real-time scheduling group (which I don't think SCHED_ULE would have), or do a (privileged) renice -11 to have considerable priority over non-privileged stuff. At least on Linux, that is. -- Matthias Andree FreeBSD ports committer